The mother of all sins...

It's that time of the year again. When the all-knowing, ultra-wise parliamentarians get together and decide, again, that the evilest evil of them all should be destroyed. Alcohol. 

In the next few days, parliament are going to get together to vote on whether alcohol should be banned in all of the Kingdom's restaurants that are not located in hotels. And vote they will, almost certainly in favour of the pointless ban. 

The current proposal stems from a relatively recent proposal to ban alcohol in Um Al Hassam, because, allegedly, customers of licensed restaurants were getting drunk and disturbing families in the area. Actually, as I recall it, some MP or another said that people were getting drunk and would, y'know, go about trying to get into houses, and y'know, fall asleep on other people’s couches, 'n stuff. But luckily it hadn’t happened yet, cause them residents were clever enough to, y'know, lock their doors. But it COULD happen. 

Hah.

But, not content with merely limiting choice, they want to destroy it altogether. The initial proposal was extended by a rather brainless bunch of muppets known collectively as 'the Parliament Services Committee'. 

"They (MPs on the committee) said banning alcohol in one area wouldn't solve the problem as it is being served in restaurants across the country," ... "Committee members have decided to generalise it, saying alcohol was the problem and banning it in Umm Al Hassam wouldn't address the core problem - as customers would shift to other places, making the ban pointless."

Now there are numerous problems with this statement. First of all, the initial proposal was made on the basis that alcohol being served in predominantly residential areas was likely to disturb the residents. There was nothing to back it up- no actual statements, testimony or incidents, but at least there was an inkling.. a mere hint of an actual argument. But then they expanded their 'argument'. Now alcohol is bad, unless of course it is being served in one of the many whore-infested dives that are known as 'hotels'. 

Generalising is not something MPs should be doing. The god that they are so determined to keep happy is in the details. To generalise is to reduce to a general form. Lump it all into one category. Pack it all up in one box. The 'evil' box. 

I can generalise too. Arabs are terrorists. Yup, you heard me. Now let me give you a leg up to that high, high horse you managed to acquire thanks to your hefty parliamentary allowance. It's not nice when others generalise, so why do it yourselves? The only cause you further is ignorance. Petrol has alcohol in it. Should we ban that too? Make all petrol stations relocate to hotel car parks. It sounds idiotic, but it is a generalisation. 

How much time is wasted on such pointless endeavours? On April 29th of last year MPs "unanimously demanded a total ban on alcohol in Bahrain. They voted in favour of a parliament-proposed law banning the import, possession, sale or production of alcohol."

But to become law, the proposal would have to be accepted by the government and the Shura Council. It wasn’t. Why? Because the ban would have far reaching economic effects; Effects far to complex for the pure parliamentary minds to comprehend. The ‘argument’ then was pretty flimsy too-

"Whether they are producers, drinkers, distributors, sellers and those who eat from its money are all damned by God,"... "Alcohol is the biggest sin, the mother of all sins."

Harsh. I reckon they should send out letters to everyone involved in the alcohol industry in the Kingdom, informing them of the impending damnation of themselves and their families.  

What about personal freedom? Just the other day Parliament's foreign affairs, defence and national security committee chairman was touting the value of personal freedom, albeit in relation to a completely different matter.

"It is like (the government is) entering your home without your permission to see what you are doing with your family. This is against Islam. Everyone has the right to personal freedom."

So now it seems personal freedom is subjective too. You are free to do what they feel you should be free to do, but do anything else and you’ll be damned, and so will your children. If the violation of personal freedom is against Islam, then surely telling a non-muslim that he is not allowed to enjoy a glass of wine with his overpriced meal is against Islam too.

Generalise with caution. Taking away the personal freedoms of others while whining about your own personal freedoms is hypocritical, selfish and intolerant – and I would assume, un-Islamic.

Everyone has the right to personal freedom. These are the words of our great, wise, all-knowing, enlightened, overpaid elected peers. These are the words to which we should hold them accountable. 

Now, who wants a beer?

Censorship 2.0

Y'know how everyone is up in arms about the whole ridiculous Internet censorship thing? Well, from what I hear, they want to take it a step further. A source at a large, national, telecommunications company that has a really bad advertising campaign promoting broadband (and begins with the letter B) recently informed me that the Ministry of Disinformation has requested...wait for it... an assessment of the feasibility of blocking the torrent protocol.

Yup. That's right. Torrents. They want to take away our torrents now. Bastards.

Whether or not they'll succeed depends on a few things, but I doubt Batelco and the other telecoms would oblige. They would be raping their revenue streams. Who the hell would consider paying 60 bloody dinars for a measly 25GB of bandwidth that they WOULD'NT BE ABLE TO USE?

And it gets worse. Much worse. According to another source, the Ministry is now allegedly in the process of acquiring a new, rather expensive ($150K+) system to filter content on Youtube. Unlike the torrent blocking feasibility study, this is (allegedly) going ahead full steam. Soon, the Ministry will tell you what non-pornographic, already monitored, homemade content you may or may not be able to view. 

This is ridiculous. Pathetic. Primitive. Pointless. Retarded. Ignorant.  Youtube is the world's biggest forum for self-expression. It nurtures creativity. It teaches. It entertains. Surely this is what the Ministry of Culture should be doing? 

The Ministry is using a system that is typically used by corporations to limit employees' online access in an effort to protect productivity. Blue Coat is its name. They spent a fair chunk of cash getting it, and allegedly, requested the system by name. So, it stands to reason that the Ministry believes we all work for them. In effect, they think they own us. And they are unhappy with how much time we spend doing 'frivolous' things. This is not how a democracy works. This is draconian, totalitarianist, dictatorial behaviour. 

We should be ashamed, outraged and above all, vocal. Complain as much as you can, to whoever is willing to listen. Write letters, post blogs, tell friends, distribute fliers, shout it from rooftops... A concerted effort to get our Kingdom's pointless attempt to control the minds of the population recognised in international media is needed. Yes, we may be giving Bahrain a bad name, but in doing so, we may also be able to prevent it from becoming a complete joke. Complain while you can. Soon, all forms of opinion will be BLOCKED FOR VIOLATING REGULATIONS AND LAWS OF THE KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN. 

Futurists and the media

They broke our Internet, but still not content with their new-fangled brilliance, the already stale ministry of cultural disinformation has set about fixing Bahrain's TV and Radio. Or so they say. 

Fixing stuff is good, especially when the stuff in question is as antiquated as Bahrain TV and Radio. Bahrain's mass media has been sub third-world forever, because, surprise, it is completely run from within a Ministry. No matter how good their intentions are, it is, and will remain, a civil service. And, as everyone knows, nothing smells more of bureaucracy than a civil service. 

So forgive me for being sceptical. I live in hope of a new, competitive, free and objective media in Bahrain, but I will not hold my breath. Instead, I expect, rather pessimistically, that the national media will get a facelift. It will look 21st centuryish. It may even feel modern. But for the media to change, a fundamental shift in the structure of our media is necessary. 

Unfortunately, such a shift seems unlikely. According to the one and only GDN, "Vaheed Associate Brand Future company... was tasked with overhauling the establishment in a nine- to 18-month period" First of all, I would like to point out that the company in question is actually called Vahid associates, a Bahrain-based self-described 'brand futurist'. A brief visit to their website (http://www.vahidassociates.com) doesn't really tell us much more. In fact, it is alarmingly amateur in many regards- from the overly abundant use of flash to the startling lack of actual information on display (the portfolio and news sections of their site are 'coming soon', despite the site dating back to 2006), one cannot help but conclude that the choice of company reflects the intentions of the Ministry. Image is apparently more important than substance. 

It gets better. The BRTC have "signed a six-month contract with renowned Monte Carlo presenter Huyam Hmoy". You've probably never heard of her. I certainly haven't. And neither has Google. Not one result. Not a single hit. Nothing. Some justification would be nice when bandying about terms like 'renowned'. Surely a famous TV presenter would exist somewhere in the world of the great wide web. At least give us some more information- you are, after all, the Ministry of Culture and Information. 

No talk about the development of Radio, aside from KFH shelling out for the redevelopment of the Holy Quran radio channel. Perhaps they believe that Radio Bahrain is perfect, and are adopting an 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' approach. Hah.

So, here we have an announcement from the Ministry of culture and Information, about redeveloping the media, reported in Bahrain's incredibly shallow media outlet of choice, that contains NO REAL INFORMATION. Should this be taken as an example of how our media is to develop? Were any questions asked before publishing the story in the oracle that is the GDN? Was any research done? They couldn't even spell the name of the company that was hired to carry out the alleged redevelopment, much less provide us with a nugget or two of insight. 

Qatar has Al Jazeera, the Emirates have Al Arabiya and Bahrain has... Bahrain TV. Does anyone even watch Bahrain TV? The middle east, Bahrain included, has one of the highest penetration rates of Satellite TV in the world. Everyone has either Showtime, Orbit or more likely, Dreambox- which gives them access to almost every other channel in the entire world. How can they be expected to tune into BTV when the competition is that fierce? Making it shinier wont encourage people to watch it. Making it worth watching might. 

Here's a suggestion. Dispose of every last bit of international programming. Develop BTV into a channel or two that only airs Bahraini and regionally produced television. Use the money you aren't paying for Fresh Prince and other decades-old sitcoms to develop a channel that can compete with the other regional players. Nurture a new, creative generation of Bahraini media and commit to turning Bahrain, the 'Freest economy in the region', into a place where media is respected, not just tolerated. 

And for the love of God, put Radio Bahrain down. Surely letting something as trivial, incompetent and amateurish exist is cruel. Kill it now and start it from scratch. Please. 

Violate This

So by now you know that Bahrain thinks the only way to learn them plebs 'bout morality is to censor the hell out of the Internet. Apparently, every second site in the great wide web is guilty of 'violating the regulations and laws of the Kingdom of Bahrain'. 

First it was Google Translate, which by the way, IS STILL BLOCKED. Because translating stuff is bad, mmmkay. If you translate, you understand. If you understand, you learn. And we're not allowed to learn now, are we?

The complaints persist. Tech forums are bad, because you can, y'know, learn about technology and get a step ahead of them censorship Nazis. Art forums are bad, because art is like, y'know, porn. Fashion sites are bad, because fashion is like, well, manikins, which we all know pervy boys like to drool over. Gambing is obviously evil, and nothing whatsoever like purchasing a fifty dinar raffle ticket in Bahrain Duty Free. Politics is bad, because it's opinionated and political 'n stuff. 

And now, the I Cant Believe They're So Stupid award of the week goes once again to the Ministry of Culture and Information. Why? 

Because, even though they have not blocked the overused, timedestroying social network that is Facebook, should you try to do something stupid like deactivate your account, you cant. Seriously. It is apparently fine to do a little online social networking, but it is ILLEGAL to close your account. That's right... if you are fed up with Facebook, tough shit. Closing your account 'violates the regulations and laws of the Kingdom of Bahrain'. Wait.. no... as I write this I tried once again to deactivate the diseased Facebook and it worked. Damn. I'll have to find something else to complain about. 

Lets go back to Google Translate. Yeah, I know... everyone knows that Google Translate is blocked. But WHY IS IT STILL BLOCKED? Either the Ministry has a financial stake in Berlitz or they are terminally retarded. How can they possibly justify Google Translate being blocked for over a month? Maybe there is a word, a secret word, that when translated will bring about the apocalypse. A secret Bahraini word. A word that only we know. And by blocking Google Translate - that evil Internet oracle that translates everything (bad words included) - the Ministry is saving humanity. 

If only we could figure out a way to turn ignorance into energy. We could save the world. All it would take is one little ignorance converter in one pointless Ministry. But who would build such a device? Not us, because as we all know, tekkie stuff is guilty of 'violating the regulations and laws of the Kingdom of Bahrain'.

Which brings us the the SITE BLOCKED screen of doom. They used to tell us what laws were being violated, but unfortunately, people can read. And when those damn literate people discovered that their legal argument was farcical, the almighty Ministry decided to do what they do best... censor. They censored themselves. Idiots. 

But what exactly are these 'regulations' of which they speak? Bahrain has regulations? Nobody told me. I know there are regulations in the financial sector and the telecommunication sector and wherever else, but the Kingdom of Bahrain, as a whole, has regulations? I would very much like to see a copy of the Official Regulations of the Kingdom of Bahrain. How entertaining that'd be... 

What next? Terms and conditions? Waivers? 

Welcome to Business Friendly Bahrain, the Island of Golden Smiles. Your experience may differ. Bahrain will not be responsible for any ignorance or injury you encounter during your stay. Freedoms are subject to availability. Terms and Conditions apply.

Ministry bad. Proxies good.

Alrighty. So you are pissed off with Batelco and the Ministry of Disinformation, Truth, Culture and Censorship, or whatever they are calling themselves these days. 

First of all, don't just accept it. Complain. Write letters. Scream. Sign petitions. Scream louder. Complain more. 

And then, when your vocal cords are suitably painful, bypass the stupid pointless censorship. 

How? It's simple. 

Download something called Hotspot. The Ministryites know about it but you can get it from a number of mirrored sites. Be slightly patient, and it shall appear. There is a downside... it is slow. Yes, slow. Slower than the pathetic stone age speeds that BaZainCom call Internet. Still, there is no 'site blocked' nonsense, no blood pressure spikes and no broken computer monitors to contend with. 

Another alternative is Ultrasurf. Again, you will have to do a little looking, but not much. Install, follow instructions and PRESTO... no 'site blocked' headaches. Unfortunately, Untrasurf, while not as slow as Hotspot, doesn't allow access to a bunch of sites, for reasons I cant be bothered to explore. 

But not to worry. You see, while these applications help get around the annoyingness, their single best use is to access the lists and lists and lists of brand spanking new Proxies that nice people from all over the globe upload on a daily basis. Find a new proxy from a list of many, shove it into your browser and be on your way. It may take a few attempts, and the proxy that works for you may only last a day or two at the outside, but it works. 

Better still, visit a proxy group on Yahoo or Google or somewhere. Many of them have email lists... which means you can get a list of brand new proxies in your inbox every single day. I could give you all step by step instructions, but I am far too lazy. 

Be free. Be anonymous. But never, EVER stop complaining. 

The World's Worst Mascot?

Speedy the Desert Racer? Are you serious? 

If this is the height of creativity in our Kingdom then Bahrain is in serious trouble. Speedy the Desert Racer? It gets blander every time I utter it. Soon it will disappear into a puff of hypo-allergenic pointlessness. 

As I understand it a competition was held to name 

the BIC's mascot, or something to that effect. The mascot, in case you did not know, is a guy in a suit with a helmet (yes, that thing in the picture is Speedy). There is nothing remarkable about him at all. Nothing memorable in the slightest. He looks like the Stig from Top Gear, but only inasmuch as the Stig looks like, y'know, a person with a helmet. 

But even the blandest of mascots deserves a name better than Speedy the Desert Racer. Yeah, it's a race, in the desert, and like most races it involves... speed. I KNOW THAT. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT. 

Speedy. Hardly a name that invokes the history and traditions of Bahrain, or the region. Yet it's a name that the rubberheads at BIC deem appropriate to represent their most valuable race. 

When Springfield got the Olympics even Homer came up with a better mascot. Springy. Far, far superior in practically every way, and that was a mascot created in a fictional universe by the town dimwit. 

The only way Speedy deserved to win the mascot naming competition is if he was the only entry. Or if the other entry was Olga the Russian Hooker. No, scratch that... Olga would have been a better (albeit more disease ridden) mascot. She would have appealed to the BIC's target market quite effectively. In fact, I propose that we start a petition to kill Speedy.

Do mascots catch diseases?